Topic 4564216
Merits
⭐ Merited by BlackHatCoiner (4) ,nutildah (2) ,Rikafip (1) ,JayJuanGee (1) ,ABCbits (1)
Here's a keeper:

(...) Just like Michael Jackson, Michael Jackson was a black man but he did surgery which everyone knows,but Jesus never did surgery but out of elusion we panted Jesus to be a white man , because Satan was a black man ,they panted him to be a white man ,to differentiate it from Satan (...)

Hmm...

So, unlike Michael Jackson, Jesus of Nazareth chose not to have any cosmetic surgery done (a worthy comparison, IMHO, and a question that's often worried me, so I'm glad to have it settled). Decoding past that point is tricky, but, it seems in ancient times there used to be some kind of directed action referred to as "panting"? Likely it meant, "to strike violently with a pair of dye-rich trousers". Apparently, so as to distinguish Jesus from the Dark Lord, we panted him to the point of his changing color. (I mean, it could be that I've got the whole "panting" thing wrong, and it's actually more like an archaic spelling of "pantsing", which means, very roughly, "to expose someone's bird against their will", but, I don't see how doing that to Jesus, even very many times, would have led to any lasting change in complexion.)

(I'm obviously kidding around. Please don't anyone get their pious panties in a twist.)