Re: TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk
Originally posted by on 05/11/2025, 07:52:45 UTC
Last rescrape: 1 month ago
Next scheduled rescrape: never
Showing 2 edited versions
Scraped on 12/11/2025, 07:53:16 UTC
Is it possible to stay the same name ?
If you use your own hosting, you can use any name you want (that's what I do).Quote
I think this would be helpful for many of us because sometimes when we go to create reports or where many images are used regularly, if the name of the image is included in the link, it can be easily identified and updated.
You can use alt-text for this:Code:
[img width=100 height=2 alt="Here you can type whatever you want to identify the image"]https://loyce.club/other/blackline.gif[/img]
Result:
If PowerGloves' patch gets applied, you'd be able to add comments to your BBCode:
[r=32]░[/r]
It's tough to appreciate (and orthogonal to its intended purpose), but, one of the really cool things about this tag is that it (accidentally) forms a pretty natural way to add "comments" to BBCode. As in, if you ask it to repeat something zero times, then you'll have a construct that persists within the BBCode of a post/PM/signature, but one that won't survive the translation into (X)HTML:
[r=0]Made by jayce[/r]
(but that's a long shot as many patches are ignored)It's tough to appreciate (and orthogonal to its intended purpose), but, one of the really cool things about this tag is that it (accidentally) forms a pretty natural way to add "comments" to BBCode. As in, if you ask it to repeat something zero times, then you'll have a construct that persists within the BBCode of a post/PM/signature, but one that won't survive the translation into (X)HTML:
[r=0]Made by jayce[/r]
Scraped on 05/11/2025, 07:58:15 UTC
Is it possible to stay the same name ?
If you use your own hosting, you can use any name you want (that's what I do).Quote
I think this would be helpful for many of us because sometimes when we go to create reports or where many images are used regularly, if the name of the image is included in the link, it can be easily identified and updated.
You can use alt-text for this:Code:
[img width=100 height=2 alt="Here you can type whatever you want to identify the image"]https://loyce.club/other/blackline.gif[/img]
Result:If PowerGloves' patch gets applied, you'd be able to add comments to your BBCode:
[r=32]░[/r]
It's tough to appreciate (and orthogonal to its intended purpose), but, one of the really cool things about this tag is that it (accidentally) forms a pretty natural way to add "comments" to BBCode. As in, if you ask it to repeat something zero times, then you'll have a construct that persists within the BBCode of a post/PM/signature, but one that won't survive the translation into (X)HTML:
[r=0]Made by jayce[/r]
(but that's a long shot as many patches are ignored)It's tough to appreciate (and orthogonal to its intended purpose), but, one of the really cool things about this tag is that it (accidentally) forms a pretty natural way to add "comments" to BBCode. As in, if you ask it to repeat something zero times, then you'll have a construct that persists within the BBCode of a post/PM/signature, but one that won't survive the translation into (X)HTML:
[r=0]Made by jayce[/r]
Original archived Re: TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk
Scraped on 05/11/2025, 07:52:45 UTC
Is it possible to stay the same name ?
If you use your own hosting, you can use any name you want (that's what I do).Quote
I think this would be helpful for many of us because sometimes when we go to create reports or where many images are used regularly, if the name of the image is included in the link, it can be easily identified and updated.
You can use alt-text for this:Code:
[img width=100 height=2 alt="Here you can type whatever you want to identify the image"]https://loyce.club/other/blackline.gif[/img]
Result:If PowerGloves' patch gets applied, you'd be able to add comments to your BBCode:
[r=32]░[/r]
It's tough to appreciate (and orthogonal to its intended purpose), but, one of the really cool things about this tag is that it (accidentally) forms a pretty natural way to add "comments" to BBCode. As in, if you ask it to repeat something zero times, then you'll have a construct that persists within the BBCode of a post/PM/signature, but one that won't survive the translation into (X)HTML:
[r=0]Made by jayce[/r]
It's tough to appreciate (and orthogonal to its intended purpose), but, one of the really cool things about this tag is that it (accidentally) forms a pretty natural way to add "comments" to BBCode. As in, if you ask it to repeat something zero times, then you'll have a construct that persists within the BBCode of a post/PM/signature, but one that won't survive the translation into (X)HTML:
[r=0]Made by jayce[/r]