Re: Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?
Originally posted by on 10/12/2025, 11:35:19 UTC
Last rescrape: 5 days ago
Next scheduled rescrape: in 1 day
Showing 2 edited versions
Edited on 10/12/2025, 12:05:49 UTC
There are a few smart, cool heads that try to be objective and fair. Thanks @yahoo62278, @LoyceV, @lovesmayfamilis. Even if we don't agree on many things, bias is never warranted -- objectivity always is. Rudeness triggers the weaker minds to throw away objectivity, they get easily tricked by their own anger into false rationalizations and justifications as is seen here. That should not happen.
No it is not, otherwise all my red tags are not abuse and are spot on. I would not trade with any single misinformation spreader here or a shitposter (including the both of you and OP), but that does not justify the negative tags according to senior DT members. I have tried this line of argumentation before myself, and it was dismissed. Therefore such a frivolous manipulation of the situation in order to make a false claim of a justified red tag on me does not work. You guys really need to take a look in the mirror, some of you are complete hypocrites and completely abusive of the seniority that you have here.
Would you trade with satofan44? Would you trust him for any deals or least urge someone to trust him?
Well, I think this question is relevant because when you don't trust someone in general you also don't trust him to make deals, so a red tag would be justified from that point of view.He's called me "LauraV" at least 3 times, including on my feedback page. His trolling is a waste of his technical knowledge, his contribution to the forum would have been much better without the drama.
Miss Laura, life can't all be about conducting research. Keep the technical section cleaner and it will be less boring. I agree with your decision; ultimately, we shouldn't resort to the same methods.
DT members must be held to a much higher standard than whatever is being asked from everyone else, only then can people actually believe that many users here are not corrupt and that they are not defending all kinds of shady shit for malicious reasons. Practice what you preach -- I believe is the relevant principle here.If this how the forum has being operating in the pass years I don't think it would have been a place where people across the world would feel free to come learn more about bitcoin from those who already have a grounded knowledge of it if they have to be given hate speech and instead.
Bitcoin does not need parasites that pretend to care about Bitcoin. How many of this parasitic bunch I have banned from other Bitcoin avenues I have long lost count. Scraped on 10/12/2025, 11:40:44 UTC
There are a few smart, cool heads that try to be objective and fair. Thanks @yahoo62278, @LoyceV, @lovesmayfamilis. Even if we don't agree on many things, bias is never warranted -- objectivity always is. Rudeness triggers the weaker minds to throw away objectivity, they get easily tricked by their own anger into false rationalizations and justifications as is seen here. That should not happen.
No it is not, otherwise all my red tags are not abuse and are spot on. I would not trade with any single misinformation spreader here or a shitposter, but that does not justify the negative tags according to senior DT members. Therefore this manipulation of the situation in order to make a false claim of a justified red tag on me does not work. You guys really need to take a look in the mirror, some of you are complete hypocrites and completely abusive of the seniority that you have here.
Would you trade with satofan44? Would you trust him for any deals or least urge someone to trust him?
Well, I think this question is relevant because when you don't trust someone in general you also don't trust him to make deals, so a red tag would be justified from that point of view.He's called me "LauraV" at least 3 times, including on my feedback page. His trolling is a waste of his technical knowledge, his contribution to the forum would have been much better without the drama.
Life can't all be about conducting research, keep my technical section cleaner and it will be less boring. I agree with your decision; ultimately, we shouldn't resort to the same methods.
DT members must be held to a much higher standard than whatever is being asked from everyone else, only then can people actually believe that many users here are not corrupt and that they are not defending all kinds of shady shit for malicious reasons. Practice what you preach -- I believe is the relevant principle here.If this how the forum has being operating in the pass years I don't think it would have been a place where people across the world would feel free to come learn more about bitcoin from those who already have a grounded knowledge of it if they have to be given hate speech and instead.
Bitcoin does not need parasites that pretend to care about Bitcoin. How many of this parasitic bunch I have banned from other Bitcoin avenues I have long lost count. Original archived Re: Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?
Scraped on 10/12/2025, 11:35:19 UTC
There are a few smart, cool heads that try to be objective and fair. Thanks @yahoo62278, @LoyceV, @lovesmayfamilis. Even if we don't agree on many things, bias is never warranted -- objectivity always is. Rudeness triggers the weaker minds to throw away objectivity, they get easily tricked by their own anger into false rationalizations and justifications as is seen here. That should not happen.
No it is not, otherwise all my red tags are not abuse and are spot on. I would not trade with any single misinformation spreader here or a shitposter, but that does not justify the negative tags according to senior DT members. Therefore this manipulation of the situation in order to make a false claim of a justified red tag on me does not work. You guys really need to take a look in the mirror, some of you are complete hypocrites and completely abusive of the seniority that you have here.
Would you trade with satofan44? Would you trust him for any deals or least urge someone to trust him?
Well, I think this question is relevant because when you don't trust someone in general you also don't trust him to make deals, so a red tag would be justified from that point of view.He's called me "LauraV" at least 3 times, including on my feedback page. His trolling is a waste of his technical knowledge, his contribution to the forum would have been much better without the drama.
Life can't all be about conducting research, keep my technical section cleaner and it will be less boring. I agree with your decision; ultimately, we shouldn't resort to the same methods.
DT members must be held to a much higher standard than whatever is being asked from everyone else, only then can someone actually believe that many people here are not corrupt and that they are not defending all kinds of shady shit for malicious reasons. Practice what you preach -- I believe is the relevant principle here.