I see double standards here.
I don't.
Have you excluded Satofan44 from your trust list yet?
No, why would I? He's not on DT.
To be clear:
Satofan44's sent feedback is obvious large-scale Trust abuse, but he's so far excluded from DT that nobody cares anymore.
Did you check the other feedback left by Mia Chloe on other forum members' profiles?
It's only a few postive feedbacks.
Do you think most of the feedback left by Mia Chloe is incorrect?
Let's see:
"Helped this user" doesn't mean the user is unlikely to scam anyone.
"Done a few designs for" doesn't mean the user is unlikely to scam anyone.
"Done a couple of photograph edits and design jobs ~ even offering to pay before hand" doesn't clearly say if any funds were risked.
"Had a small deal with this user ~ I am giving a trust because he was easy to communicate and deal with", for $15 which wasn't even risked.
"Worked with ~ for some time now and he is a nice campaign manager" sounds acceptable, the campaign manager could have not paid thus funds were probably risked. But I can't be sure without a Reference link proving it.
"willingly borrowed me a large amount of funds without a collateral" doesn't mean the user could have scammed, he could have been scammed.
Do you believe his trust list is bad?
See
the list: it's pretty safe, mostly selecting users who are on DT1 already.
I see you instantly concluded after seeing one of his feedback on satofan44's profile. I think leaving controversial negative feedback always been accepted here and DT members barely care about one single feedback. If most feedbacks left by you are correct and one is incorrect, I don't care about that one feedback.
Of course feedback is "an average", I usually don't agree with all feedback someone left. But you're comparing 1 (in my opinion abusive) negative feedback from Mia Chloe to DT-members with many good negatives and one abuse one. My Trust exclusions are
well documented, and I don't easily exclude users. That's why I posted my opinion hoping for improvement. But after seeing those positive feedbacks, combined with the emotional negative feedback, I don't think this user belongs on DT.