Re: Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?

Help me understand which part reads as abusive and which part is not correct.

You're saying trading is high risk because you don't like his posts.

I think I explained everything already.

Trading with Satofan44 is risky due to his history of aggressive and abusive forum behavior, including frequent insults, derogatory remarks (e.g., racist comments), and retaliatory negative trust feedback for non-scam issues.

His poor interpersonal style increases the likelihood that disputes will escalate during trades.

Quote

Did you just add AB de Royse777 to DT2 so his negative feedback on Satofan44 shows up?

I did, but not for the reason you mentioned. AB de Royse777 was already on the DT network, and he left many accurate pieces of feedback, while also providing some controversial ones. But just one day ago, Etranger and inspace excluded him to kick him out of the DT network, which is why I noticed that his feedback isn't showing anymore. If I am not mistaken, these two exclusions stem from personal issues, and I can sense it. I maintain good relationships with all the campaign managers and consider them friends. It doesn't matter what is between them, but using friends to kick someone out of the DT network doesn't look good. I just believe he has left some accurate feedbacks and deserve to be on the DT network frequently. Wink

Honestly the more you reply the more you show reasons why you might not be good for DT.

You gave a red tag to a user for not liking his words basically. His words have nothing to do with trading and being high risk. Then you added a user to counteract others exclusions. I have seen this done in the past but it's rare that it's done.

We (everyone) is not perfect, I realize this and so should everyone else, but the trust system cannot work if people use it incorrectly. I really dislike the DT lottery and how it's supposed to be better for the forum as a whole, but so many are clueless that it's not having the intended effect IMO.