Re: Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?
by on 10/12/2025, 16:02:35 UTC
I was at work, and the two previous posts were written there and in a little hurry. Sorry @goldkingcoiner I was in a hurry, I quoted a few people that I value on their forum and are reputable members of this forum in general.
@LoyceV
For Chloe's feedback, as I said myself, I do believe that dealing with him is a risk judging by his behaviour, not because he has shown direct signs, such as offers to a ponzi scheme in PMs, but because he considers everyone else around him a retard, thus, it's safe to assume that he might as well believe that someone who gets scammed is one. By this definition, the negative feedback is justified, but doesn't stand on solid grounds (concrete evidence) that he's truly a trading risk. Calling him an asshole is understandable after receiving many insults, like Chloe mentioned, but you're making yourself as bad as he is, which to me is no use and I haven't resorted to such measure, because I don't want to go down that level.
The reason you can't be insulted is because you're a legendary member, and I do not mean it by rank. Your posts and your presence online has been great. There's no denying that.
@lovesmayfamilis
I respect and value your opinion, along with @LoyceV and @yahoo62278, which is why I changed my negative tag, although I believe he's a major risk when he's behaving like that, it doesn't have solid grounds to show that he's a trading risk and doesn't line up with the forum's guidelines. I never disagreed that his posts have great knowledge in them, but being an ass about it and calling everyone retarded is insulting. I didn't open this thread because I'm petty, nor offended, I couldn't care less about his opinion, but to me, it doesn't line up with how you should talk to people and how any member should be treated, newbie or legendary.
@DireWolfM14
I always respected your character, even though we haven't interacted much, but I disagree with you. I'm not making a topic to bitch about calling me an idiot etc. I don't care, but me, Chloe and other members aren't their "sole victims". He's like that to anyone who doesn't line with his views and knowledge. The point of this topic is that even though there's freedom of speech here, there should be a line of when it's too much. Your positive trust, also in the way @LoyceV has provided examples also doesn't line up with how trust works, I'm mentioning it because you said about trust abuse. My views don't have to align with yours, and that's perfectly okay.
@LoyceV
For Chloe's feedback, as I said myself, I do believe that dealing with him is a risk judging by his behaviour, not because he has shown direct signs, such as offers to a ponzi scheme in PMs, but because he considers everyone else around him a retard, thus, it's safe to assume that he might as well believe that someone who gets scammed is one. By this definition, the negative feedback is justified, but doesn't stand on solid grounds (concrete evidence) that he's truly a trading risk. Calling him an asshole is understandable after receiving many insults, like Chloe mentioned, but you're making yourself as bad as he is, which to me is no use and I haven't resorted to such measure, because I don't want to go down that level.
The reason you can't be insulted is because you're a legendary member, and I do not mean it by rank. Your posts and your presence online has been great. There's no denying that.
@lovesmayfamilis
I respect and value your opinion, along with @LoyceV and @yahoo62278, which is why I changed my negative tag, although I believe he's a major risk when he's behaving like that, it doesn't have solid grounds to show that he's a trading risk and doesn't line up with the forum's guidelines. I never disagreed that his posts have great knowledge in them, but being an ass about it and calling everyone retarded is insulting. I didn't open this thread because I'm petty, nor offended, I couldn't care less about his opinion, but to me, it doesn't line up with how you should talk to people and how any member should be treated, newbie or legendary.
@DireWolfM14
I always respected your character, even though we haven't interacted much, but I disagree with you. I'm not making a topic to bitch about calling me an idiot etc. I don't care, but me, Chloe and other members aren't their "sole victims". He's like that to anyone who doesn't line with his views and knowledge. The point of this topic is that even though there's freedom of speech here, there should be a line of when it's too much. Your positive trust, also in the way @LoyceV has provided examples also doesn't line up with how trust works, I'm mentioning it because you said about trust abuse. My views don't have to align with yours, and that's perfectly okay.