Re: Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?
Originally posted by on 11/12/2025, 13:16:28 UTC
Last rescrape: 4 days ago
Next scheduled rescrape: in 1 day
Showing 1 edited version
Scraped on 11/12/2025, 13:21:59 UTC
@DireWolfM14
I always respected your character
I always respected your character
I appreciate you saying so.
@DireWolfM14
but I disagree with you.
but I disagree with you.
And that's the beauty of this forum. It may be the only forum left with the level of free speech that we enjoy. We can disagree respectfully, or we can be jack asses to each other if we choose. With me, it dependent on my mood... For others... well, they might have only one mood, lol.
I'm not making a topic to bitch about calling me an idiot etc. I don't care, but me, Chloe and other members aren't their "sole victims".
Victims? Come on, that's a bit melodramatic. One of the biggest issues with this world is the idea that words hurt. Only the week minded and the guilty are hurt by words. Could someone have been more diplomatic in their approach? Yes. Does it have as impactful of an affect? The 5 rapid-fire pages of this thread suggest otherwise.
If you check my feedback page, you'll see that I haven't left such feedback on people's profiles before, and I don't plan to do so.
Good job. I suggest you keep it up and remove any that you've left for emotional reasons.
As for not liking his words, let me tell you in detail.
People with such a terrible personality cannot be trusted at all. "words" reflect their personality. It's not about liking or disliking his words; it's about his personality. His personality suggests high potential for conflict, unfair reputational damage, or unreliable interactions, especially in a trust-based environment like the Bitcointalk forum.
People with such a terrible personality cannot be trusted at all. "words" reflect their personality. It's not about liking or disliking his words; it's about his personality. His personality suggests high potential for conflict, unfair reputational damage, or unreliable interactions, especially in a trust-based environment like the Bitcointalk forum.
Sorry for the late reply to this, obviously others have addressed the fallacy of this statement. Suffice it to say that I disagree on principal. It's been my experience that people who are brutally honest are indeed honest in general.
But this isn't the issue. Satofan44 isn't looking to do any trading that I can see, and his trustworthiness in trades is impossible to decern at the moment.
The issue is that he called out many of us higher ranking members for things we're actually doing... Posting rubbish to meet out sig campaign quota. I see plenty of merit kings, and DT members doing it. Satofan44 is pointing it out, and many of you are butthurt about it. Even if he didn't call you out directly, you're butthurt about it because you know deep in your heart that he's talking about you and your actions.
Original archived Re: Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?
Scraped on 11/12/2025, 13:16:28 UTC
@DireWolfM14
I always respected your character
I always respected your character
I appreciate you saying so.
@DireWolfM14
but I disagree with you.
but I disagree with you.
And that's the beauty of this forum. It may be the only forum left with the level of free speech that we enjoy. We can disagree respectfully, or we can be jack asses to each other if we choose. With me, it dependent on my mood... For others... well, they might have only one mood, lol.
I'm not making a topic to bitch about calling me an idiot etc. I don't care, but me, Chloe and other members aren't their "sole victims".
Victims? Come on, that's a bit melodramatic. One of the biggest issues with this world is the idea that words hurt. Only the week minded and the guilty are hurt by words. Could someone have been more diplomatic in their approach, yes. Does it have as impactful of an affect? The 5 rapid-fire pages of this thread suggest otherwise.
If you check my feedback page, you'll see that I haven't left such feedback on people's profiles before, and I don't plan to do so.
Good job. I suggest you keep it up and remove any that you've left for emotional reasons.
As for not liking his words, let me tell you in detail.
People with such a terrible personality cannot be trusted at all. "words" reflect their personality. It's not about liking or disliking his words; it's about his personality. His personality suggests high potential for conflict, unfair reputational damage, or unreliable interactions, especially in a trust-based environment like the Bitcointalk forum.
People with such a terrible personality cannot be trusted at all. "words" reflect their personality. It's not about liking or disliking his words; it's about his personality. His personality suggests high potential for conflict, unfair reputational damage, or unreliable interactions, especially in a trust-based environment like the Bitcointalk forum.
Sorry for the late reply to this, obviously others have addressed the fallacy of this statement. Suffice it to say that I disagree on principal. It's been my experience that people who are brutally honest are indeed honest in general.
But this isn't the issue. The issue is that he called out many of us higher ranking members for things we're actually do... Post rubbish to meet out sig campaign quota. I see plenty of merit kings, and DT members doing it. Satofan44 is pointing it out, and many of you are butthurt about it. Even if he didn't call you out directly, you're butthurt about it because you know deep in your heart that he's talking about you and your actions.