While the Trump administration is massively better than the Biden administration regarding persecution of privacy-protecting services, this seems partly to be due to general chaos at the agencies and a deprioritization of this kind of thing, rather than a real pro-freedom ideology; you can see in e.g. the Samourai and Paxful cases that they will go after privacy-protecting services when convenient.
Not that I want to push things into any direction, but isn't it hypocritical that services like Wasabi coordinators, Whirlpool servers, or Joinmarket are allowed to be advertised? From a legal point of view, these services are treated equally with mixers, and the arrest of the Samourai developers in the name of money laundering clears this out further. The fact that mixers require to forfeit custody of coins does not amplify their legal exposure.
I just don't see how being custodial is a requirement to consider it illicit. Either all privacy enhancing services can be used to launder money, custodial or not, and thus must be discriminated in this forum, or they aren't.