Re: Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board
Originally posted by on 12/12/2025, 06:52:32 UTC
Last rescrape: 4 days ago
Next scheduled rescrape: in 2 days
Showing 1 edited version
Scraped on 12/12/2025, 06:57:44 UTC
Taproot is not particularly new. If it was great and important its usage among bitcoin transactions would be increasing instead of being on a downtrend past the Ordinals hype.
Data proves you wrong. What other evidence do you require? ABCBits said "give it a year". Again, Taproot isn't new.
What other logical fallacies do we have? "Have faith"? Maybe "trust the process"?
Data proves you wrong. What other evidence do you require? ABCBits said "give it a year". Again, Taproot isn't new.
What other logical fallacies do we have? "Have faith"? Maybe "trust the process"?
Original archived Re: Users who spread false/fake/unhelpful information on technical board
Scraped on 12/12/2025, 06:52:32 UTC
Taproot is not particularly new. If it was great and important its usage among bitcoin transactions would be increasing instead of being on a downtrend past the Ordinals hype.
Data proves you wrong. What other evidence do you require? ANCBits said "give it a year". Again, Taproot isn't new.
What other logical fallacies do we have? "Have faith"? Maybe "trust the process"?
Data proves you wrong. What other evidence do you require? ANCBits said "give it a year". Again, Taproot isn't new.
What other logical fallacies do we have? "Have faith"? Maybe "trust the process"?