No, it would not hurt if that was pre-planned.
Regarding this?

@nutildah, I will speak for DYING_S0UL.
Naim027 and DYING_S0UL never felt the same person to me. I am 100% certain that DYING_S0UL can't be Naim027. I have had telegram contact with both Naim027 and DYING_S0UL. Most of the time DYING_S0UL was seeking suggestions, advices, knowledge about forum and bitcoin related things (he still does when he need) while Naim027 was a user who was working for me (some spreadsheet checking) like some other users who works for/with me.

I guess I should address the act of user inspace separately (I hope it's not off-topic. If off-topic then mods can delete and I will copy it to a new topic)
-----------------
How is your tag helping here at the same time is it appropriate? There are no concrete evidence yet that he is a scammer but you are tagging him because you are suspecting. You can not tag someone as a scammer because you suspect he will be a scammer.

I have seen you around for long time, and I saw how your account was built too, I know who is your main employer and supporter, I saw how you jumped in conclusion about other campaign managers or projects handled by other mangers (This is not your first time. Note: I am not good enough to find old post and bring reference so I apologize if my mind tricked me but I am sure about the jumping in conclusion part at-least one more time that happened before). Can I suspect that you are doing this for your own benefit, to benefit the employer, your supporter or worse thing is you are him with a different account? All are hypothesis anyway. But fact is - that does not matter. My point is:

"Learn Bitcoin" is a campaign manager without any scamming record yet (regarding the debate of he is Naim027  or someone else as a person). He has and is still managing serval campaigns successfully. Your tag will give a doubt to his employers (maybe you will direct those employers to your employer campaign manager: your benefit that I can think of). He will lose business, all hard work. What will be the end result? Here are two possibilities I can think of:

1. If he is not Naim027 then an innocent user get punished, lose all his handwork just because you are so called suspicious. We may or may not see "Learn Bitcoin" anymore. If we don't see the account "Learn Bitcoin" that won't mean that he disappeared, I know for a fact that the person behind "Learn Bitcoin" will continue under another name. He may or may not thrive like "Learn Bitcoin" but he will be among us however for your wrong judgement that person will suffer if he was innocent.
2. If he is Naim027 then you are forcing him to start over everything perhaps he will even become more desperate and become a scammer (I can not recall there was any accusation about Naim027 as a scammer). If he scam then you are creating a scammer.

As a campaign manager, I always wanted to see more managers to come and make this business better. But unfortunately there is this secret hates between some of us. One day you think the other manager is good friend to you but next day you discover he was talking behind your back. You find him jealous because he is losing campaigns for you. You were supposed to improve your service but you chose not to.

Many will have their own opinions, views about campaign managers but it's hard to deny that for this community, managers are a mandatory pillar and we need to co-operate with each others.

Note: I am speaking up for a promising manager here.

No, it would not hurt if that was pre-planned.
Regarding this?

@nutildah, I will speak for DYING_S0UL.
Naim027 and DYING_S0UL never felt the same person to me. I am 100% certain that DYING_S0UL can't be Naim027. I have had telegram contact with both Naim027 and DYING_S0UL. Most of the time DYING_S0UL was seeking suggestions, advices, knowledge about forum and bitcoin related things (he still does when he need) while Naim027 was a user who was working for me (some spreadsheet checking) like some other users who works for/with me.