Re: The Stake campaign is filled with frauds & questionable accounts
by on 14/12/2025, 21:29:45 UTC
⭐ Merited by LoyceV (6)
(...) allocates the most for weekly payments compared to the competition, as far as I know, at least 5+ managers are involved in the management of this campaign, and they are still considered the lowest quality and a hotbed of spam.
This is a difference between Rainbet and Stake:Rainbet
No, sir. Rainbet has the largest weekly payment allocation, around $9,060 for its 174 participants.
However, Rainbet has a selective manager team.
Rainbet only pays for 20 posts per week, which minimizes spam from each participant.
The manager does not maintain participants who have financial misconduct RedTrust, especially those proven to have committed fraud in signature campaigns or bounties.
Stake
Their weekly payment allocation is around $5,000 for 65 participants.
Stake pays up to 60–70 posts for all participants, which creates a lot of spam from a single participant who makes posts within less than a 10 minute interval.
The manager is less selective, even cow, chicken and buffalo farms with RedTrust tags are still being used, possibly for that spam.
From these differences, we actually already know which one is better.
This data was taken from both spreadsheets for comparison.