I don't say that wagering requirement is useless, but the high requirement is. I think 10X might be reasonable enough, but not 45X.
Reasonable for what or according to whom? I think thatโs the question you need to think of and try to answer.
Reasonable for me and also for others who have critical thinking. 10X to 15X is already a difficult target.
It won't be reasonable for someone who used to accept rules as facts superior above critics. I am not the only one who think this way, already other users in this discussion share the same idea.
Maybe nothing can be done to ask for a minimum requirement standard between all casinos, but at least we can discuss those standards and rise awareness about how the bonus system is a trap named "bonus", and that casinos are putting poison in honey because this is an unreachable goal.
Being a commun standard between all casinos doesn't make it right.