Topic 5276159
I'm not defending Betfury here, but we should also be realistic that the basic idea of ​​casino bonuses (any, not only BF) is not to enable players to travel exotically or eventually retire. It is a form of casino promotion, any player is under no obligation to accept it.
that should be obvious, but sometimes some of those "free bonuses" are so bad, the casino would have been better off not having them at all.
Is it possible that because there are some people who use these free bonuses, that is the reason the casino has continued offering them? Or don't you think that if the offers were generally ignored, the casino would have made some improvement to make it enticing?

I think so, what do you think?