Re: "Learn Bitcoin" is silent when farmed account queries are raised
Originally posted by on 16/12/2025, 11:04:54 UTC
Last rescrape: 9 hours ago
Next scheduled rescrape: in 6 days
Showing 1 edited version
Scraped on 16/12/2025, 11:10:09 UTC
I am puzzled about this just as you are. I have no idea why AB de Royse777 aka Royse777 is defending naim027. Well maybe there is an explanation.
When the AB de Royse777 account was either hacked or sold several years ago (when it was created as "Royse777" by the Russian speaking member that originally registered it) and then ended up with the current operator, there were signs he was from Bangladesh. As we know, naim027 is from Bangladesh therefore maybe there is an affinity akin to some sort of fellow countryman or brotherhood type of association.
From the thousands of accounts he could have selected a member or two to employ to help with spreadsheets, why on earth would he willingly pay an account farmer, merit abuser, compulsive liar and chief manipulator such as naim027 after he had already been exposed and banned for first time and then defend him?
Why he feels the need to speak up for a so-called promising manager exposed as naim027 rather than distance himself from the ban evading account farmer naim027 is a valid question.
This post from the previous page deserves a response from the main protagonist defending naim027 and his account farm, just bumping the post before it gets buried under new posts.
You are obviously aware of his situation but here's a little detailed post by LoyceV https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416864.msg61117985#msg61117985
When the AB de Royse777 account was either hacked or sold several years ago (when it was created as "Royse777" by the Russian speaking member that originally registered it) and then ended up with the current operator, there were signs he was from Bangladesh. As we know, naim027 is from Bangladesh therefore maybe there is an affinity akin to some sort of fellow countryman or brotherhood type of association.
From the thousands of accounts he could have selected a member or two to employ to help with spreadsheets, why on earth would he willingly pay an account farmer, merit abuser, compulsive liar and chief manipulator such as naim027 after he had already been exposed and banned for first time and then defend him?
Why he feels the need to speak up for a so-called promising manager exposed as naim027 rather than distance himself from the ban evading account farmer naim027 is a valid question.
This post from the previous page deserves a response from the main protagonist defending naim027 and his account farm, just bumping the post before it gets buried under new posts.
How is your tag helping here at the same time is it appropriate? There are no concrete evidence yet that he is a scammer but you are tagging him because you are suspecting. You can not tag someone as a scammer because you suspect he will be a scammer.
There may not be evidence that he has scammed, but there is evidence he likely naim027 who is littered with red tags. "Learn Bitcoin" is a campaign manager without any scamming record yet (regarding the debate of he is Naim027 or someone else as a person). He has and is still managing serval campaigns successfully. Your tag will give a doubt to his employers (maybe you will direct those employers to your employer campaign manager: your benefit that I can think of). He will lose business, all hard work. What will be the end result?[/b]
If the user is naim why should he be allowed to continue to operate here? The bigger question why would you protect him? Why would you continue to work with him after all the drama? You are obviously aware of his situation but here's a little detailed post by LoyceV https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416864.msg61117985#msg61117985
1. If he is not Naim027 then an innocent user get punished, lose all his handwork just because you are so called suspicious. We may or may not see "Learn Bitcoin" anymore. If we don't see the account "Learn Bitcoin" that won't mean that he disappeared, I know for a fact that the person behind "Learn Bitcoin" will continue under another name. He may or may not thrive like "Learn Bitcoin" but he will be among us however for your wrong judgement that person will suffer if he was innocent.
2. If he is Naim027 then you are forcing him to start over everything perhaps he will even become more desperate and become a scammer (I can not recall there was any accusation about Naim027 as a scammer). If he scam then you are creating a scammer.
I think you can clear this up quite easily. Is he or is he not naim? I am going to say yes by the way you wrote some facts in this portion. I've bolded it for you. Also, you know his alts I assume? I'm very confused as to why, if he is who we think he is, you would protect him and deceive the community?2. If he is Naim027 then you are forcing him to start over everything perhaps he will even become more desperate and become a scammer (I can not recall there was any accusation about Naim027 as a scammer). If he scam then you are creating a scammer.
Note: I am speaking up for a promising manager here.
Why? Original archived Re: "Learn Bitcoin" is silent when farmed account queries are raised
Scraped on 16/12/2025, 11:04:54 UTC
I am puzzled about this just as you are. I have no idea why AB de Royse777 aka Royse777 is defending naim027. Well maybe there is an explanation.
When the AB de Royse777 account was either hacked or sold several years ago (when it was created as "Royse777" by the Russian speaking member that originally registered it) and then ended up with the current operator, there were signs he was from Bangladesh. As we know, naim027 is from Bangladesh therefore maybe there is an affinity akin to some sort of fellow countryman or brotherhood type of association.
From the thousands of accounts he could have selected a member or two to employ to help with spreadsheets, why on earth would he willingly pay an account farmer, merit abuser, compulsive liar and chief manipulator such as naim027 after he had already been exposed and banned for first time and then defend him?
This post from the previous page deserves a response from the main protagonist defending naim027 and his account farm, just bumping the post before it gets buried under new posts.
You are obviously aware of his situation but here's a little detailed post by LoyceV https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416864.msg61117985#msg61117985
When the AB de Royse777 account was either hacked or sold several years ago (when it was created as "Royse777" by the Russian speaking member that originally registered it) and then ended up with the current operator, there were signs he was from Bangladesh. As we know, naim027 is from Bangladesh therefore maybe there is an affinity akin to some sort of fellow countryman or brotherhood type of association.
From the thousands of accounts he could have selected a member or two to employ to help with spreadsheets, why on earth would he willingly pay an account farmer, merit abuser, compulsive liar and chief manipulator such as naim027 after he had already been exposed and banned for first time and then defend him?
This post from the previous page deserves a response from the main protagonist defending naim027 and his account farm, just bumping the post before it gets buried under new posts.
How is your tag helping here at the same time is it appropriate? There are no concrete evidence yet that he is a scammer but you are tagging him because you are suspecting. You can not tag someone as a scammer because you suspect he will be a scammer.
There may not be evidence that he has scammed, but there is evidence he likely naim027 who is littered with red tags. "Learn Bitcoin" is a campaign manager without any scamming record yet (regarding the debate of he is Naim027 or someone else as a person). He has and is still managing serval campaigns successfully. Your tag will give a doubt to his employers (maybe you will direct those employers to your employer campaign manager: your benefit that I can think of). He will lose business, all hard work. What will be the end result?[/b]
If the user is naim why should he be allowed to continue to operate here? The bigger question why would you protect him? Why would you continue to work with him after all the drama? You are obviously aware of his situation but here's a little detailed post by LoyceV https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5416864.msg61117985#msg61117985
1. If he is not Naim027 then an innocent user get punished, lose all his handwork just because you are so called suspicious. We may or may not see "Learn Bitcoin" anymore. If we don't see the account "Learn Bitcoin" that won't mean that he disappeared, I know for a fact that the person behind "Learn Bitcoin" will continue under another name. He may or may not thrive like "Learn Bitcoin" but he will be among us however for your wrong judgement that person will suffer if he was innocent.
2. If he is Naim027 then you are forcing him to start over everything perhaps he will even become more desperate and become a scammer (I can not recall there was any accusation about Naim027 as a scammer). If he scam then you are creating a scammer.
I think you can clear this up quite easily. Is he or is he not naim? I am going to say yes by the way you wrote some facts in this portion. I've bolded it for you. Also, you know his alts I assume? I'm very confused as to why, if he is who we think he is, you would protect him and deceive the community?2. If he is Naim027 then you are forcing him to start over everything perhaps he will even become more desperate and become a scammer (I can not recall there was any accusation about Naim027 as a scammer). If he scam then you are creating a scammer.
Note: I am speaking up for a promising manager here.
Why?