Re: Till when should we keep up with abusive behaviour?
by on 10/12/2025, 11:35:19 UTC
There are a few smart, cool heads that try to be objective and fair. Thanks @yahoo62278, @LoyceV, @lovesmayfamilis. Even if we don't agree on many things, bias is never warranted -- objectivity always is. Rudeness triggers the weaker minds to throw away objectivity, they get easily tricked by their own anger into false rationalizations and justifications as is seen here. That should not happen.
No it is not, otherwise all my red tags are not abuse and are spot on. I would not trade with any single misinformation spreader here or a shitposter, but that does not justify the negative tags according to senior DT members. Therefore this manipulation of the situation in order to make a false claim of a justified red tag on me does not work. You guys really need to take a look in the mirror, some of you are complete hypocrites and completely abusive of the seniority that you have here.
Would you trade with satofan44? Would you trust him for any deals or least urge someone to trust him?
Well, I think this question is relevant because when you don't trust someone in general you also don't trust him to make deals, so a red tag would be justified from that point of view.He's called me "LauraV" at least 3 times, including on my feedback page. His trolling is a waste of his technical knowledge, his contribution to the forum would have been much better without the drama.
Life can't all be about conducting research, keep my technical section cleaner and it will be less boring. I agree with your decision; ultimately, we shouldn't resort to the same methods.
DT members must be held to a much higher standard than whatever is being asked from everyone else, only then can someone actually believe that many people here are not corrupt and that they are not defending all kinds of shady shit for malicious reasons. Practice what you preach -- I believe is the relevant principle here.