BitList

I don't say that wagering requirement is useless, but the high requirement is. I think 10X might be reasonable enough, but not 45X.

Reasonable for what or according to whom? I think that’s the question you need to think of and try to answer.

Reasonable for me and also for others who have critical thinking. 10X to 15X is already a difficult target.
It won't be reasonable for someone who used to accept rules as facts superior above critics. I am not the only one who think this way, already other users in this discussion share the same idea.

Maybe nothing can be done to ask for a minimum requirement standard between all casinos, but at least we can discuss those standards and rise awareness about how the bonus system is a trap named "bonus", and that casinos are putting poison in honey because this is an unreachable goal.

Being a commun standard between all casinos doesn't make it right.

In this context, it seems to be talking about bonuses and wagering requirements that must be completed for the bonus money to become our money.

Actually, such high requirements I also find it difficult to achieve, but considering this is a bonus so the casino has the right to make such policies. On the other hand as a user, I think we also have the right to negotiate a little although the final result is still the casino who decides.

I would have much more reservations if the terms being discussed here were about our deposit money and we had to reach such a large wagering requirement. And I guess it makes sense that we would object so much.